Protected areas have long been a cornerstone of marine fisheries management, and numerous studies have revealed key insights into how these reserves should be designed to optimize success. Despite their proven effectiveness in oceans, reserves have not been widely implemented or studied in freshwater. In fact, freshwater ecosystems are very underrepresented within protected areas, and are often only incidentally included in terrestrial protected areas. Freshwater protected areas are a targeted approach to address overharvesting which threatens food security for hundreds of millions of people. A study recently published in the journal Nature describes an assessment of community-based reserves in a river in Thailand. The research revealed that freshwater protected areas dramatically enhanced the species richness, density, and biomass of the fish communities that they protect (Koning et al. 2020).

 

The Salween River is the largest remaining free-flowing river in Southeast Asia, and the watershed of its tributary the Mae Ngao is home to thousands of people who heavily depend on the river for food. Over the last few decades, the communities along the river have voluntarily established dozens of fish reserves in an effort to conserve and improve the river’s fishery. This grassroots reserve network includes protected areas of different ages and sizes, varying enforcement levels, and different distances from the villages that created them. All of these factors are known to have an impact on the success of marine reserves, and thus the Mae Ngao reserve network provided an ideal opportunity for the researchers to test how these factors influenced reserve success in a freshwater setting. To collect data on the fish communities present inside and outside of the protected areas, the researchers performed paired snorkel surveys of 23 different reserves and nearby unprotected sites. The clear water of the river in the dry season allowed the team to visually gather data on the abundance and variety of fish species present. In addition, they estimated the lengths of observed fish to estimate the total biomass present in each site. They also collected information on depth and substrate type at each site to verify that habitat did not influence differences in the fish community inside and outside of reserves.